Our Home

 

 

Adult Forum on Planet Stewardship

St. James’ Episcopal Church

April 6, 2003

 

 

 

Additional Resources
Other formats
More Info:
Ann Finch

 

SECTION 1

What does scripture tell us?

 

God’s relationship to creation

These all look to you

to give them their food in due season;

when you give it to them, they gather it up;

when you open your hand, they are filled with good things.

When you hide your face, they are dismayed;

when you take away their breath, they die

and return to their dust.

When you send forth your spirit, they are created;

and you renew the face of the ground. - Psalm 104: 27-30

 

He wants us to respect life and the life-giving properties of the earth…

The Lord spoke to Moses on Mount Sinai, saying: Speak to the people of Israel and say to them: When you enter the land that I am giving you, the land shall observe a sabbath for the Lord  Six years you shall sow your field, and six years you shall prune your vineyard, and gather in their yield; but in the seventh year there shall be a sabbath of complete rest for the land, a sabbath for the Lord: you shall not sow your field or prune your vineyard.  You shall not reap the aftergrowth of your harvest or gather the grapes of your unpruned vine; it shall be a year of complete rest for the land. - Leviticus 25:1-5

 

… but He recognizes our nature.

Then Noah built an altar to the Lord and took of every clean animal and of every clean bird, and offered burnt offerings on the altar.  And when the Lord smelled the pleasing odor, the Lord said in his heart, “I will never again curse the ground because of humankind, for the inclination of the human heart is evil from youth; nor will I ever again destroy every living creature as I have done.

As long as the earth endures,

seedtime and harvest, cold and heat,

summer and winter, day and night,

shall not cease.”

God blessed Noah and his sons, and said to them, “Be fruitful and multiply, and fill the earth.  The fear and dread of you shall rest on every animal of the earth, and on every bird of the air, on everything that creeps on the ground and on all the fish of the sea; into your hand they are delivered.” - Genesis 8:20-9:2

 

We sin against God, our neighbor and all of creation

For from the least to the greatest of them,

everyone is greedy for unjust gain;

and from prophet to priest, everyone deals falsely.

They have treated the wound of my people carelessly,

saying, “Peace, peace,”

when there is no peace.

They acted shamefully, they committed abomination;

yet they were not ashamed,

they did not know how to blush.

Therefore they shall fall among those who fall;

at the time that I punish them, they shall be overthrown, say the Lord.

Thus says the Lord;

Stand at the crossroads, and look,

and ask for the ancient paths,

where the good way lies; and walk in it,

and find rest for your souls.

But they said, “We will not walk in it.” - Jeremiah 6:13-16

 

Man’s condition is dependent upon nature’s condition…

I looked on the earth, and lo, it was waste and void;

and to the heavens, and they had no light.

I looked to the mountains, and lo, they were quaking,

and all the hills moved to and fro.

I looked, and lo, there was no one at all,

and all the birds of the air had fled.

I looked, and lo, the fruitful land was a desert,

and all its cities were laid in ruins

before the Lord, before his fierce anger.

For thus says the Lord: The whole land shall be a desolation; yet I will not make a full end.” - Jeremiah 4:23-27

 

…and nature’s is dependent upon Man’s

Hear the word of the Lord,

O people of Israel;

for the Lord has an indictment

against the inhabitants of the land.

Swearing, lying and murder,

and stealing and adultery break out;

bloodshed follows bloodshed.

Therefore the land mourns

and all who live in it languish;

together with the wild animal

and the bird of the air,

even the fish of the sea are perishing. - Hosea 4:1-3

 

Obedience to God’s will is our hope for environmental healing

For the creation waits with eager longing for the revealing of the children of God; for the creation was subjected to futility, not of its own will but by the will of the one who subjected it, in hope that the creation itself will be set free from its bondage to decay and will obtain the freedom of the glory of the children of God. - Romans 8:19-21

 

In our love of Jesus Christ, is the mandate to love all of creation

In the beginning was the Word, and the Word was with God, and the word was God.  He was in the beginning with God.  All things came into being through him, and without him not one thing came into being.  What has come into being in him was life, and the life was the light of all people.  The light shines in the darkness, and the darkness did not overcome it. - John 1:1-5

 

He is the image of the invisible God, the firstborn of all creation; For in him all things in heaven and on earth were created, things visible and invisible, whether thrones or dominions or rulers or powers - all things have been created through him and for him.  He himself is before all things, and in him all things hold together. - Colossians 1:15-16

 


 

SECTION 2

Walking the walk

 

Social Justice –  The social justice movement advocates that environmental policy has relevance only if it ensures gender and social justice - fewer people will not lead to less poverty.   Others argue that numbers are important.  Ecological Justice – The ecological justice movement advocates that justice should not be limited to humans but to all life on the planet. 

Intergenerational Justice – Rather then “borrowing” from our children’s future, we are “closing down all savings accounts.”

 

How does the Episcopal Church carry this out?

The Environmental Stewardship office is a part of the Peace and Justice Ministries Office of the Episcopal Church.  It provides education, liturgical and action ideas to facilitate our Church’s commitment to stewardship of Creation. 

Activities include:

• Developing a network of coordinators throughout the Church

• working on environmental legislation

• disseminating resolutions

• providing curricula, resources and conference information

• representing the Church at meetings of other organizations

The office works with:

• The Eco-Justice Working Group of the National Council of Churches

• Episcopal Power and Light - Combines Episcopal churches and their congregations into energy-buying aggregate.

• The Episcopal Ecological Network - Grassroots network that helps the Church advocate and articulate environmental protection and creation stewardship.

Recent documents issued by the Church, its members and the Anglican Communion include:

• 3/10/2003: Letter to Senate and House Budget Committee re: Arctic National Wildlife Refuge (signed by John B. Johnson of the Episcopal Church Office of Government Relations)

   [ http://www.episcopalchurch.org/peace-justice/article_91.asp ]

              “The Episcopal Church opposes the inclusioin of any revenues derived from activities related to drilling or exploration for oil or gas in the Arctic National Wildlife Refuge in the Fiscal Year ’04 budget… protecting the Arctic is more than just an issue of stewardship of God’s creation… [it] is also a question of human justice and the fundamental rights of the Gwich’in people… nearly all of whom are Episcopalian…  Their subsistence way of life intrinsically links the well-being of the Procupine caribou herd, which use the Coastal Plain as its summer calving grounds… The Coastal Plain is so sacred to the Gwich’in. they will not walk on that ground even in time of famine… The rights of the Gwich’in to continue their way of life and to pass on their culture to their children and grandchildren are fundamental and must be respected.”

• 2/27/2003: To Serve Christ in All Creation: A Pastoral Letter from the Episcopal Bishops of New England [ http://www.episcopalchurch.org/peace-justice/article_93.asp ]

              “We confess our past complacency, ignorance and neglect.  We regret Christian techings that claim or imply that human beings have divine sanction to destroy God’s creation.  We pledge our prayers, our time, our leadership and our energies to the work that needs to be done.  We encourage all members of the Episcopal Church in New England to see in the promises of the Baptismal Covenant the call to serve Christ in all creation…

              “Hurt not the earth, neither the sea nor the trees,” - Rev 7:3

              “God in Christ has redeemed not only the individual human soul, but also the whole of creation…  Is it not possible to recognize all creation as our neighbor?  We are participating in God’s mission to restore all people and all creation to unity with God and each in Christ.”

              9 action points follow

• 8/18-23/2002: Global Anglican Congress on the Stewardship of Creation Declaration to the Communion

               [ http://www.episcopalchurch.org/peace-justice/article_77.asp  ]

              “At the last LambethConference in 1998 our Bishops again identified the environment as one of the key moral and relifious issues of our time… Greed and over-consumption, which have dictated so much of our economic development in the past, must be transformed into generosity and compassion.  Transformation is, at its heart, a spiritual matter…”

              13 action points follow

 • 8/18-23/2002: Global Anglican Congress on the Stewardship of Creation Declaration to the Communion

              Declaration to the United Nations World Summit on Sustainable Development 

              Opens with: “We desperately need a change of spirit.  The environmental debate is as much about religion and morality as it is about science.”

              Continues on to speak about stewardship and closes with 10 action points.

              [ http://www.episcopalchurch.org/peace-justice/article_76.asp ]

• 2/24/2002: Conservation Based Energy Policy Resolution
 [ http://www.episcopalchurch.org/peace-justice/resolution_15.asp ]- In response to the Bush administration’s and the 107th Congress’ high priority on passing energy legislation, calls on Congress to pass conservation-based energy legislation; calls for raising of vehicle fuel efficiency standards; opposes oil drilling in ANWR and other lands that are important to traditional cultures and indigenous peoples.

 

This structure - and the work of the Church - underscore the fact that earth stewardship is a piece of doing justice and loving mercy.

 

 


 

SECTION 3

Current issues in earth stewardship

 

The I=PxAxT model

I=PxAxT means environmental Impact = Population x Affluence x Technology (where “affluence” is the amount of resources used per person and “technology” is the pollution produced per unit).  - Ehrlich and Holdren

 

              The carrying capacity (Definition:  The maximum number of organisms an environment – local, regional, or global – can support over a specified period of time)of a given system is limited.  Typically, an animal population will increase until food and/or territory become scarce in an area, then the surplus will either migrate or die.  This is the way nature sustains healthy populations.

              Technology has enabled humans to defy traditional carrying capacities.

            • Medical advances have increased life spans

            • Modern agriculture has increased food supply

 

They are using resources faster than those resources can be replenished.  Human population size has an effect on both human & non-human creatures & their ability to have a healthy life.

 

Agriculture has allowed human population to increase due to increased food supplies, increased nutrition (and fertility), and the establishment of more stable communities.

 

Transportation facilitates food and water sources being remote from population centers, so land preservation (for farming, hunting, etc.) becomes a non-issue in the consciousness.

 

Population fluctuates due to

• disease - which is eased by modern medicine, but aggravated by transportation

• famine - which is eased by transportation and agriculture, but can be aggravated by poor agricultural practices

• war - weapons of mass destruction vs. hi-tech pinpointed assaults.  Modern weapons can be highly efficient in devastating pouplations. Genocide (a biodiversity issue?) vs. other conflicts.

 

 

Anasazi Indians of the So’western U.S.

Maya civilization of Central America

Roman Empire Some evidence exists that as countries  develop, a transition in demographics leads to a more stable population.

 

European Industrial Revolution:  classic example of “demographic transition”. Assisted by massive out-migrations from Europe.

 

Less developed countries: Fall in death rates, but less rapid decline in birth rates  =  continued population growth. Despite falling growth rates, the world’s population continues to grow because there are more women of childbearing age, resulting in “demographic momentum”. In 1999-2000, 80% of the population lived in “less developed” countries, with a per capita GNP of US$1,260.

In less developed countries, people need arable land to grow crops.  With growing populations,  people are clearing parks, wildlife preserves and  tropical forests. There is a global trend toward urbanization. Some consequences:

      • increased energy usage 

      • deforestation causing flooding, loss of biodiversity (biomedical assets) and food for future generations

      •twice as much clean water needed in next decade

      • loss of tropical species for medicine, agriculture & gene pool

      • acid rain and atmospheric change

      • increased use of fossil fuels & other non-renewable resources

 

More than one billion people live in abject poverty...                                       

      but can the earth support even a modest standard of living for these people, much less an increased standard for many others, without irreparable damage to critical life-supporting systems?

Women’s and children’s health tends to be better when family planning measures are taken...

      but there are cultural reasons for high birth rates, including status (fertility as power), economic (cheap labor).

Worldwide, women want the same things for their children: good health, education, jobs, adequate food, and housing…

      but poor countries are caught in a cycle of poverty, rapid population growth and environmental degradation. The richer countries have their own problems with over-consumption, population density and environ- mental degradation.

 

 


 

SECTION 3

Creative Approaches to Current Problems[i]

 

 

• Partnership between government and NGOs

• Participation by local people in designing programs

• Dedication to financial and human resources

• Commitment to essential factors in population control:

       

√  Women’s education - Education of women is a key to overcoming poverty and encouraging family planning.  1 billion people aged 15-24 is a great potential asset if we can provide healthcare for them.

√  Women’s employment opportunities

√  Rise in women’s legal and social status

√  Decrease in infant mortality

√  Women’s reproductive health and family planning services

√  Education of men

 

• Economic development is linked to environmental stability.

• Sustainable development recognizes growing  global interdependence and promotes an integrated approach.

• Sustainable development is long-term.

• Sustainable development recognizes a general responsibility.

 

“As homeowners, we wouldn’t neglect or damage our houses until they were unfit to live in.  Why would we do that with our planet?                                                                                                           “  Kathryn Sullivan,

                                                                                        the first woman to walk in space

 

FOOD

The crops, animals and other biomatter that we use in 12 months takes 14.4 months to replenish.  Sustainable development adjusts use and resources so that we live off the “interest.”

“Put people first and the environment second, but also … remember that when you exhaust the environment, you destroy people.”

                                                                                                            Mark Malloch Brown

                                                               administrator of the UN Development Program

 

15 cash crops provide 90% of the world’s food, but we need crop rotation.

Navdanya (9 Seeds) in New Delhi, teaches farmers to grow hardy native varieties of crops, using organic methods.  Navdanya works in an area for three years, establishing local seed banks and self-supporting organization.  It’s spread to 80 districts in 12 states, and has collected more than 2000 seed varieties.

 

WATER

Only 2.5% of water is fresh.

1.1 billion people lack access to clean drinking water

2.4 million lack sanitation

Agriculture uses 2/3 of fresh water consumed

      We need more crop per drop - drought & salt tolerant crops

      Better monitoring of irrigation needs

      More efficient irrigation methods

WASH (Water, Sanitation And Hygiene for All) - a global effort that aims to provide water services and hygiene training to everyone who lack them by 2015. UN, 27 govts. & numerous NGOs have signed on.  The UN has declared 2003 as “The Year of Freshwater.”

 

ENERGY

About 2.5 billion people have no access to modern energy services

Power demands of developing nations are expected to grow 2.5% per year - how should that be met?

      Micro-hydroelectric plants (Kenya, Sri Lanka, Nepal) - generate 200 kw without complex dams or catchment areas.  Last 20 years.  Can be community-owned.

      The Global Village Energy Partnership (World Bank, UNDP and donors) -match solutions to need and geography (solar energy in remote areas, expansion of grid in Third World urban areas).

 

BIODIVERSITY

“[Wilderness is] where man himself is a visitor and does not remain.”

-U.S. Wilderness Act, 1964

Tropical rainforests cover 6% of Earth’s land and are home to 50% of all known species.  How to balance man’s development needs with nature’s development needs?

 

“…you have to build economies around protection,”

- Gustavo Fonseca

Sr. VP for science at Conservation Intl.

 

Wildlife corridors

Marine reserves

Ecotourism

Debt for nature swaps

      Nature Conservancy purchases land to hold as wilderness, e.g. the atoll of Palmyra (south of Hawaii) and the logging rights to 1.6 million acres in Bolivia - which doubled the size of a national park.

      Conservation International - protecting the Cardamoms from exploitation.  Once used as sanctuary by the Khmer Rouge; now being slashed and burned by Cambodian loggers, hunters and farmers.  CI pays for rangers to patrol against poaching and also provides health and agricultural projects to support local economy. (6 foreign lumber concessions have been cancelled.)

      Equator Initiative  (public/private group) -

sustainable development in equatorial belt (promoting beekeeping for supplemental income in Kenya, restoring marine fisheries in Fiji).

      Global Conservation Trust - conserve genetic materials from plants for use by local agricultural programs.

      Center for Environmental Leadership in Business (Washington state) -  working with auto & oil companies (Ford, Chevron, Texaco & Shell) to draft guidelines for biodiversity conservation in oil and gas exploration.

      Wildlife Conservation Society -  Myanmar locals were hunting red pandas and leaf deer in Hkakabo Razi National Park and trading the pelts for salt.  WCS provides salt for $5000/year. (How does that affect the Chinese traders who were supplying the salt?)

      Tropical Rainforest Conservation Act of 1998 - US authorized President to reduce some countries’ debt in exchange for forest protection (a concept begun in Bolivia in 1987 by Conservation Intl.)  In June 2002, US cancelled $5.5 million of peruvian debt in exchange for protection of 27.5 million acres of tropical rainforest, home of pink river dolphins and giant water lilies.  Covington & Burling provided pro bono legal advice.


 

Synopsis by Donna Judkins

of Planet Awakening

By Patricia Waak

 

Introduction

Planet Awakening summarizes some human population basics and the effects of human population on both human and non-human creatures.  It discusses the complexities of human population and various belief systems on the subject of stewardship and the environment.  Some issues that prevent consensus building are outlined. 

 

In the Beginning

 

 

Population:  How Do We Define the Problem - Much of the natural world has been disappearing at an alarming rate.  All species ultimately are dependent on the same resource base.  A healthy world for people is also a healthy world for wildlife.

 

o       Malthus, in 1798, hypothesized that human population, if unchecked, would increase geometrically while food production could increase only arithmetically, resulting in overpopulation and a human population crash similar to those seen in animal populations.

o       A 1972 study (Meadows) attempted to use a computer model to determine the number of people the Earth could support under various scenarios of resource use.  They estimated that if many conservation and recycling practices were employed that the Earth could support a stable population of 4 billion [the population is now over 6 billion].

o       In 1980, The Global 2000 Report to the President summarized the affects of overpopulation.  Critics of the report countered that population growth creates a large pool of workers and provides additional geniuses to develop technological innovations to overcome resource shortages.

o       The preliminary predictions have not been realized exactly, such as massive worldwide mortality from starvation, but many countries have experienced cycles of famine, environmental decline and death.

o       A model developed by Ehrlich (author of The Population Bomb) and Holdren shows a generalized relationship among the number of people (P), resources used per person, or affluence (A), pollution produced per unit of resource used, or technology (T), and environmental impact (I):  I = P x A x T.  This model shows that conservation and pollution control measures alone do not account for environmental degradation, population must also be considered.

o       It is estimated that between 39% and 50% of the land on our planet has been transformed or degraded by humans.  Visions of overpopulation used consist mainly of images of crowded streets in Calcutta or starvation in Ethiopia, but now are including, more and more, visions of urban sprawl, crowded highways and disappearance of open space.

 

o       Most creation stories begin with a couple living in harmony with the world.

o       Hunter-Gatherers:  The first humans lived 1-2 million years ago in Africa.  Their population stayed below 125,000 and was regulated mostly by food supplies, disease, accidents and wars.  They were hunter-gathers and impacted the natural environment very little.  Their fertility was low, probably because of the need to move with children.

o       Agricultural Societies:  The advent of agriculture allowed the human population to increase due to increased fool supplies, increased nutrition (and fertility), and the establishment of more stable communities.  The population still fluctuated due to disease, famine and war.

o       Modern Age:  By the beginning of the modern era, the world population was around 170 million and by the time of Columbus’ voyages, the population numbered 500 million.  Less then 300 years later, at American Independence, the number reached 1 billion.  It took more than a century, to 1930, to go from 1 to 2 billion.  Then, by 1960, just 30 years later, the planet had its third billion.  It took only half that time, 15 years to grow to 4 billion and then 12 years to go to 5 billion.  Adding the 6th billion took 13 years, signifying the beginning of a decline in population growth rates.

o       Future:  Current projections are that the world population will be 8-10 billion by 2025, the less developed countries making up 7-9 billion because more than three quarters of the growth is occurring in those countries.  The world population should more than double, perhaps even triple, during one lifetime, a phenomenon unparalleled in history.

 

o       Definition:  The maximum number of organisms an environment – local, regional, or global – can support over a specified period of time.

o       Biological systems have limits.  Typically, for example, an animal population will increase until food and/or territory become scarce in an area, then the surplus will either migrate or die.  This is the way nature sustains healthy populations.

o       Healthy human populations, too, can only survive within the parameters of the ecological carrying capacity.  Humans have defied the traditional carrying capacity through technological advances and the substitution of one resource for another.

o       Humans are currently depleting non-renewable resources.

o       What is the ultimate carrying capacity of the Earth for humans?  This is under debate.  Some measures could increase the carrying capacity, such as, conversion to grain diets, redistribution of wealth and use of all arable land.  Dr. Carl Djerassi’s answer (1988) to the question captures a chief theme of this book.  He said:

That depends on what you think about the quality of life.  If you mean standing up and having one meal a day, the number is enormous.

 

If you’re talking about the way we live now – which means misery for half the people in the world, a so-so life for a few others, and an attractive life for a few hundred million – then I think we’ve already exceeded the maximum.”

o       Anasazi Indians of the Southwestern U.S., Maya civilization of Central America, and possibly, the Roman Empire are suspected of going into demise as a result of failure to live within the carrying capacity of their land base..

o       The dramatic change in the human population growth rate is largely attributed to medical technology and modern agriculture (including genetic alteration of plants).  These have allowed increases in life expectancy and food.

 

o       Some evidence exists that as countries develop, a transition in demographics leads to a more stable population.

o       The industrial revolution in Europe is often given as the classic example of “demographic transition”. 

§         Before:  Birth rates and death rates were high

§         Early - better sanitation and higher standards of living:  Death rates dropped, birth rates initially remained high.

§         Mid – Lower infant mortality rates and better living conditions resulted in a desire for fewer children:  Birth rates also began to decline.

§         Post:  Birth rates and death rates equalized and resulted in stabilization, with some European countries actually having lower birth than death rates.

§         Note:  This economic and demographic transformation, however, was assisted by massive out-migrations from Europe.

o       The pattern has been different in less developed countries.  The fall in death rates has not brought about a drop in birth rates as quickly.  The result is continued population growth, often too rapid for the economies of those countries to adjust to the sheer number of people.

o       Despite falling growth rates, the world’s population continues to grow, even though, the average number of children born to women of reproductive age in developing countries (excluding China) has declined from 6.2 children per woman in the early 1960s to 3.7 today.  There are more women of childbearing age than before, resulting in “demographic momentum”.

o       The book gives examples of how this momentum is expected to cause continued population growth.

 

o       Definition:  Overpopulation exists when the numbers of people and/or their consumption patterns degrade or destroy the natural resources on which all life depends.  This definitions takes into account both numbers and consumption rates – a key point.

o       Some interesting facts:

- In 1999-2000 global population was 6 billion.

- 80% of the population lived in “less developed” countries, with a per capita GNP of US$1,260.

o       The U.S. population is growing faster than the natural rate of increase due to migration from other countries.  This is partly attributed to the economic disparity between less developed and more developed countries.

o       Imbalances occur when groups of people seek a standard of living that cannot be sustained without degrading the natural resource base (overconsumption) and when modes of production pose a physical threat to the environment and to people.

 

o       In less developed countries, people need arable land to grow crops.  With growing populations, families are clearing parks, wildlife preserves and tropical forests.

o       In more developed countries, wetlands and other habitats are being sacrificed to build roads, apartment buildings, etc.

o       The significance is that there is a limit to the planet’s resources and that life-supporting ecosystems are essential to life on earth as we know it!

 

o       Population vs. resources is a global problem.

§         Several current examples are given, including: U.S./Canada acid rain struggle; erosion by the major river system in India which starts in Nepal, Bhutan, and China; deforestation in Nepal causing flooding in Bangladesh; and human-induced global climate change.

o       There is a global trend toward urbanization.  In the next 20 years, the urban population is projected to increase to 4 billion globally, while the rural population will remain the same.

o       Some needs of the growing population are expected to be:

§         Increased energy usage – leading to greater atmospheric change.

§         Twice as much clean water will be needed in the next decade.

§         More deforestation will occur:

-          More cleared land, esp. in tropical countries where rapid deforestation has often taken the form of slash-and-burn agriculture which destroys some of the richest habitats on earth, leading to erosion and loss of moisture-retaining vegetation.

-          These types of activities harm the land and guarantee that there will be less food available for future generations.  This has been seen in Africa and the Middle East.

-          This loss of tropical species is also of concern they are important for medicine, agriculture and a diverse gene pool.

-          Deforestation plays an important role in global climate change.

§         Global climate change resulting from increased fossil fuel use and deforestation are expected to result in more green-house gases in our atmosphere.

-          The earth’s temperature is increasing.

-          Carbon dioxide is the chief culprit. 

-          The depleted ozone layer (not to be confused with the pollutant, ozone) adds to the changes.

 

o       Today, more than one billion people live in abject poverty.  The question is posed whether the earth can support even a modest standard of living for these people, much less an increased standard for many others, without irreparable damage to critical life-supporting systems.

o       Women’s and children’s health tends to be better when family planning measures are taken.  Women bearing large numbers of children usually sacrifice their rights to good health, education and employment.

o       Surveys indicate that worldwide, women want the same things for their children:  good health, education, jobs, adequate food, and housing.

o       The author identifies success stories in family planning (e.g., Zimbabwe, Mexico and Indonesia) and urges that expenditures for family planning and reproductive health need to be doubled in the next decade to meet the demand for child spacing and fertility regulation.

o       In general, people in more developed countries have a higher standard of living than in less developed countries.

 

o       There is no easy solution.

o       Some advocacy groups for women have striven to increase family planning, but have feared admitting a link between population and environment for fear that environmental degradation will be blamed on poor women.

o       There is no one cause and effect – it is a cycle.  The poor countries are caught in a cycle of poverty, rapid population growth and environmental degradation.  The richer countries have their own problems with over-consumption, population density and environmental degradation.

o       The author advocates that we live as a global society.

§         Developing countries need a combination of population stabilization, equitable economic development, and conservation of natural resources to allow for short- and long-term survival.  They need encouragement, plus financial and technical assistance for policies and practices that reduce human impacts on ecological resources.

§         Developed countries need growth management of cities and communities, reassessment of economic values and systems and conservation for long-term sustainable use.

§         In general, long-range vision, changes in life-style, commitment to an Earth ethic, and organized action are needed.

§         The 1994 United Nations Conference on Population Development (ICPD) developed a sustainable development concept with four major points:

v     Economic development is linked to environmental stability.

v     Sustainable development recognizes a growing global interdependence and promotes an integrated approach.

v     Sustainable development is long-term.

v     Sustainable development recognizes a general responsibility.

§         Four factors were identified to help countries achieve the goal of stabilizing populations while providing for basic needs of their people:

v     Partnership between government and non-government organizations

v     Participation by local people in designing programs

v     Commitment to essential factors in fertility decline:

o       Women’s education

o       Women’s employment opportunities

o       Rise in women’s legal and social status

o       Decrease in infant mortality

o       Women’s reproductive health and family planning services

o       Education of men.

v     Dedication to financial and human resources by both the rich an poorer countries.

§         The author states that population is the single most important environmental issue facing us.

 

 

Ethics, Morality and Religion The religious community has long identified poverty as a fundamental issue for society, and some members have tackled consumption reduction, but there has been great reluctance to deal with population issues, with all their controversies.  The author points out that with too many children and not enough food people are too distracted with just staying alive – leaving little time for spiritual nourishment.  The attitudes of some major religious groups are summarized in Table 1.

 

The Principles of Justice - Traditionally, attitudes were biocentric (human health tied to health of nature) but have become anthropocentric (focused on humans).

 

In 1994, the International Conference on Population and Development (ICPD) held by the United Nations in Cairo outlined a program of action with goals for improving economic well-being, preserving environmental integrity, improving the status of women, providing health care, and lowering over-consumption.

 

Ecological problems can be caused by poverty (e.g., poaching) or by affluence (e.g., people wanting spacious property encroaching on critical bear habitat).

 

 

 

Conclusion

·                  “Religious leaders, communities of conscience, environmental activists, and women’s health advocates all have the desire to promote a world that is healthy for individuals.  That desire must be transmitted into action for the benefit of all life on Earth.  Finding consensus on fundamental issues of conflict is the beginning of the process.  This guide should be used to provoke dialogue, raise questions, and design solutions.”


 

 



 

Table 1:  Attitudes of some major religious groups.

TYPE OF RELIGION

BASIS FOR ECOLOGY/EARTH ETHIC

ACCEPT ARTIFICIAL BIRTH CONTROL

ADVOCATE WOMEN’S RIGHTS

Ancient Traditional Religions

High – many had a “Mother Earth” attitude.

Probably low – but some had myths of beings that would punish people for overpopulation or overconsumption.

--*

Judaism

Moderate to High - Bal tashchit” means “do not destroy”; 7 year crop rotation.

--

--

Christianity

Moderate to High – stewardship important but interpretations vary.  Urbanization has changed attitudes.

Varies widely

Generally high

-Catholics

High – 1996 Environmental Justice Program.

Low – Vatican opposed.

Moderate to High – “pro-woman” program for single mothers.

-Episcopalians

High – 1994 General Convention - recycling and energy conservation.

High – 1930 Lambeth Conference approved contraception and family planning.

High – Rev. Cindy is a prime example.

-Lutherans

High

High

High

-United Methodists

High – strong force in the environmental movement.

High

High

-Mormons

Moderate – the Church does not have an official position, but many Mormons support.

Low to Moderate – 1998 birth control left up to individual – historically not encouraged.

High

-Presbyterians

High – Church believes is critically important.

High

High

Unitarian Universalism

High – have a “Flower Communion” ceremony.

High

High

Islam

High – 1998 “green jihad” began. Earth is mentioned 453 times in Qur’an. Some concern over oil industry practices, however, in some Muslim countries.

Low – Qur’an does not preclude contraception, but Islamic scholars have historically discouraged – only allowed if not permanent and does not interfere with a woman’s hormonal cycle.  Islamic countries have some of the highest pop.  growth rates.

Low – women have unequal rights.  Thus, reproductive education has not worked.  Islamic women challenged their role at the Cairo Conference.

Buddhism

High – concepts of “rebirth (reincarnation)” and “interdependence (negative karma if selfish)”.

Moderate – because life is considered precious, generally birth control is not encourages.  However, when resources are low, contraception is allowed to preserve the quality of life.

High

Hinduism

High – natural environment, especially trees and rivers, are considered sacred.  Many Indian women were killed in a tree-hugger movement (date?).

Moderate – Hindu texts celebrate having children but the Indian government has installed an aggressive family planning program.  It has not been very effective due to poor health and lack of women’s empowerment.

Moderate – generally femininity is highly regarded, but women still lack empowerment.

Indigenous Spirituality

High – many examples of pro-environment traditions, such as prayers to animals that are hunting to show respect.

Some examples of birth control, but generally not addressed.

Varies but some examples of women being honored.

New Religious Perspectives

High – example, Gaia theory that the Earth is a living system.

Not addressed – but probably